Dependable Erection

Friday, August 24, 2007

Trees- update

Alex Johnson, who is the Urban Forestry Manager for the City of Durham, has taken the time to respond to some of the issues Josh raised in his email to the Ellerbe Creek Watershed Association, excerpted below. I'm reprinting Alex's response below. I think the dialog being established in this case is good for the city, its residents, and the future streetscape of our urban neighborhoods. There's a lot of expertise aroudn here. Making sure it's all utilized is in everyone's best interests.

You may have read the article in the N&O about Durham’s dying trees. You may have also seen Josh Rose’s plea to plant natives under powerlines and forego the exotics.

Please let me share my perspective as Urban Forestry Manager for Durham.

First; Replacement trees for ‘07/08 (Natives outnumber exotics):

Overcup oak (native) Ginkgo (exotic)
Live oak (native) Lacebark elm (exotic)
Willow oak (native) Trident maple (exotic)
American elm (native) Chinese pistache (exotic)
Red maple (native) crepe myrtle (exotic)
Sugar maple (native) Japanese dogwood (exotic)
American elm (native) Japanese snowbell (exotic)
Yellowwood (native) Chinese redbud (exotic)
Oklahoma redbud (native)
Snowdrop tree (native)


Second; Many native species are not available locally in the quantity, size, or quality required.

Third; No causal link’s been established between the introduction of Japanese dogwood and the appearance of dogwood anthracnose.

Finally; Although I prefer natives, they do best in undisturbed conditions. Most are very sensitive to soil chemistry, hydrology, compaction, pollution, heat, and other urban stressors, more so than particular exotics. This is particularly true with the understory trees suitable for planting under powerlines.

If your planting space consists of a 3’ gap between the curb and the sidewalk filled with the typical clay backfill of urban sites, Crepe myrtle is simply your best choice.

Even the tougher natives like smoketree and fringetree don’t lend themselves to being planted in narrow strips because they don’t grow into perfect lollypops with clear trunks under green canopies; this is what we are required to have in that streetside strip to allow motorists and police officers a clear view around and through the trees.

With the restrictions on what I can plant due to the challenging nature of urban planting sites, the scarcity of natives in the nursery trade, and the need to accommodate internal restrictions, I need to have a broad a pallet of trees to draw upon. This pallet is going to inevitably contain exotic species. To expect or demand anything else is understandable, but doesn’t take into account the complexity of the issue.


I've pointed out to Alex a particular planting in my neighborhood where several willow oaks were taken down and replaced with crepe myrtle, where narrow right of way, sidewalks, etc. were not an issue. It may be that the neighbors asked for these trees, or it may simply be a case where that was what was on hand. Hopefully, out of this conversation will emerge a policy where the right tree is matched to the right location, rather than the easiest or most convenient planting.

Labels: ,

7 Comments:

  • I understand the concern Alex has, but I'd like it if we'd find a way to reduce the number of "lollipop trees" that go in. They're vastly inferior when it comes to providing shade, dissipating heat, and generally improving the cityscape. Now, I completely understand that we can't have willow oaks planted in 3' strips between sidewalks and roads, unless we either a) plan on cutting them down at age 35 or b) like having really bumpy, torn up sidewalks and roads. But I wish, in our sidewalk and road planning, that we'd set aside wide circles to put the big trees in.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 12:12 PM  

  • Great set of posts, Barry.

    While crepe myrtles that are allowed to mature without being crepe murdered every year can be quite pretty, I agree with Michael that there are other costs to eliminating large trees that are often discounted - skin cancer prevention, promotion of physical activity and other health outcomes are associated with shade. No one ever seems to talk about large shade trees as a safety barrier between pedestrians/ houses and wayward cars. I don't think police/fire sightlines should dominate urban design any more than the turning radius of the largest ladder truck in the fire fleet should dictate the width of every road.

    What really bothers me - in the article and generally - is the deference to the powerlines as the axis around which streetscape design should turn. I like having power as much as the next person, but I'd like to see some more evenhandedness between the benefits of street trees and the design of the power grid. Why not push the power companies to improve this antiquated system of draping big cables in the air that get messed up by storms, cars, tree limbs. While I'm as big a fan of history as anyone, it seems all very 1910s to me.

    GK

    By Blogger Gary, at 1:39 PM  

  • Why not push the power companies to improve this antiquated system of draping big cables in the air that get messed up by storms, cars, tree limbs. While I'm as big a fan of history as anyone, it seems all very 1910s to me.

    Almost all new subdivisions have underground distribution. They could bury it in older neighborhoods with above ground distribution but, trust me, you'd be unwilling to pay for it. And it would disrupt the roots of the trees.

    The first people to complain about tree trimming are often the first people to complain about the power going out when an untrimmed tree limb falls on the power line.

    Carpinus caroliniana (American hornbeam) does just fine in my "death strip" between the sidewalk and curb. Raleigh "the city of trees" once tried to get me to cut them down until they grew tall enough where I could limb up the lower branches for visibility.

    Lagerstroemia (Crape myrtles) tend to be multitrunked and present more of a visual obstacle.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:06 PM  

  • Complaining about trimming trees/downed powerlines is a useless cycle. We have two benefits that are in conflict - the rightfully beloved shade trees that have quantifiable societal benefit, including people's property value, and an essential service. There isn't a lot of incentive for power company monopolies to either change the state of the art in power distribution or to offer added benefits such as buried powerlines in order to get business. What are you going to do - go without power? But if you could choose a different power provider and get a better solution in exchange for a 3 year contract or something similar, that balance of goods would be restored. Right now, there is a serious lack of creativity out there.

    Unfortunately, this conflict of two benefits typically becomes cast as one of those utterly boring dichotomized holy wars of evil money hungry power providers versus dangerous tree-hugging hippies rather than people really looking for a win-win.

    GK

    By Blogger Gary, at 10:00 PM  

  • Unfortunately, too often when I hear about advocating the use of native flora exclusively, it is the result of extremism. Sadly, there is likely just as high a percentage of scaremongers among native plants evangelists as there are racist Republicans.

    If I go to my parents' garden, I see more butterflies than anywhere else in this area and, believe me, the plants have a diverse heritage. I can't stand Bradford pear lollipops as much as the next person, but diversity of life is there to be celebrated in all its forms, regardless of where it originated and whether it's a plant or a human being.

    Bradford pears are faulty in that they will eventually break apart under their own weight and they smell like fish when they bloom. Crepe myrtles, however, have beautiful blossoms, beautiful bark, lovely branches and they don't smell.

    By Blogger Lenore, at 10:55 PM  

  • i always found the smell to be more reminiscent of burnt rubber than anything else.

    The problem with exotics is that you often don't know just how invasive they're going to end up until it's too late.

    Vis kudzu.

    Or, if you've spent any time up north, gypsy moths.

    By Blogger Barry, at 11:15 PM  

  • Let me try again.

    The power companies are regulated monopolies. They are told by the government exactly how much they are allowed to charge in order to ensure a reasonable profit margin to investors balanced by the desire for the lowest possible rates for customers. This is done by the

    North Carolina Utilities Commission

    http://www.ncuc.commerce.state.nc.us/

    They are also required to serve everyone no matter how uneconomical it is to do so. They are given a monopoly so that they can amortize capital improvements over many years of rate paying customers. And, yes, they do end up making the profitable customers subsidize the unprofitable customers.

    The technology for underground distribution has been around a long time but it is extremely expensive to retrofit into existing neighborhoods that were built before it was available. Aside from burying the powerlines themselves, you need to put in new pad-mounted transformers (those green boxes) and then bury the power lines in everyones' yards coming from those all the way up to the customers' service entrance (electric meters).

    Almost all new subdivisions use it because the lack of obstructions makes it economical to install. Believe me, the power companies don't like having to do tree trimming. But the prior commenter is right. If you want the lights to stay on during a storm you have no choice.

    Pyrus calleryana 'Bradford' or "Bradford Pear", which is so overplanted, is pollinated by flies. Well you you know what attacts flies? It isn't vinegar and it isn't honey. Well that's the smell those trees mimic.

    The whole native vs. non-native is a red herring. You can find misbehaving species of both.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home